Cornell College Department
About Cornell Academics Admissions Alumni Athletics Offices Library

Department of Politics

111. INTRODUCTION TO POLITICS

January "Iowa Caucus Edition" 2004

Dr. Robert W. Sutherland, Instructor

Amanda Swygart-Hobaugh, Consulting Librarian in the Social Sciences

22 January 2004

CAUTION: The Course Outline on Line should be checked frequently for updates. Reading assignments are subject to change, so the online syllabus is the only definitive version. Changes in reading assignments will not be made within 24 hours immediately preceding class meetings.

HOW TO REACH THE INSTRUCTOR: 305 South Hall, Ext. 4226, early in the day (8-9am). Other times by appointment arranged before and after class or by e-mail. I rarely check my voice mail and often forward my calls to the South Hall Faculty Secretary, so a prompt response from me is best gained by e-mail.rsutherland@cornellcollege.edu

 

Class Meetings: South 302 but exceptions are early and often. For specific times places, see Schedule.

Reading Materials from the Bookstore: Principles of Politics and Government (Brown & Benchmark); Pocket Style Manual (Bedford/St. Martin's).

Course Synopsis:

  • Introduction to College Writing in the Study of Politics
  • American Politics and Public Policy in Global Context: Globocop or Globobully
  • American Politics and Public Policy in the Iowa Caucuses: Grassroots or Media Campaigns
  • The Public Policy Paper

Course Requirements:

  1. Unannounced Quizzes over reading assignments: 10% of the final grade; missed quizzes may not be made up, except in the case of documented emergencies
  2. Exams: Midterm (15) & Final (25)
  3. Public Policy Paper: 1) Abstract/Topic Essay/Outline 10%, 2) Initial Draft 15%, Final Paper 25%.

Miscellaneous Red Tape: [dull, but important!]

  1. "Truth in Lending" -- Students borrowing extra time to complete their papers will be charged interest at the rate of 5% of their grade per hour. Interest free extensions will be given only in cases of documented emergency. No work can be accepted after 5 PM on the last day unless a formal application for a grade of "incomplete" has been filed with the Registrar.

  2. "Truth in Learning" -- Portions of the Compass on dishonesty in academic work are incorporated by reference into this course description. Violators will be prosecuted.

  3. "Administrative Procedures Act" -- Portions of the Catalog on adding and dropping courses are incorporated by reference into this course description.

  4. "Course Revisions Act" -- Final papers and exams remain with me until the course is offered again; they are invaluable in helping me to improve later course assignments. I reserve the right to keep copies of some papers and exams indefinitely.

GRADES

SCHEDULE & Unannounced Quizzes

Beginning times for class are firm; quitting times are flexible. Questions to guide your reading will be found on following pages (click on underlined Day #s). The questions on unannounced quizzes will largely be drawn from these reading guide questions. Those who bring notes that address these reading guide questions to class will be permitted to use their notes on unannounced quizzes. All assignments are to be completed by class time on the day for which they are listed.

WEEK #1

DAY ASSIGNMENT

#1--Class meets at 9 AM & 1:30 PM in South Hall Room 302, with an hour in Library 126 from 10-11 AM.. The AM meetings will review the Course Outline, locate on line the articles assigned for afternoon discussion, and include a brief information literacy test for which no preparation is asumed. The PM meeting will discuss Samuel P. Huntington, "The Clash of Civilizations;" Lady Margaret Thatcher, "Moral Foundations of Society" and "The West Must Prevail;" Prime Minister Tony Blair, "A Fight for Liberty."

#2--9:30 AM in South 302 Principles of Politics and Government, Chapter 3; Philip Bobbitt, (2003, January) "The Market State," New Statesman [On Line via LexisNexis Academic.] 1:30 PM, South 302: Five Interlinked Parts of PBS Interview with Niall Ferguson on Globalization, Terrorism, and American Empire.

#3--9:30 AM in South 302 Principles of Politics and Government, Chapter 12. 1:00 PM in Library 127 to meet with Consulting Librarian in the Social Sciences, Mandy Swygart-Hobaugh, who will guide your research in the public policy. Be sure to make by e-mail an individual appointment with her today. Contact Mandy Swygart-Hobaugh.

#4--9:30 AM in South 302 Principles of Politics and Government, pp. 135-147, 163-184. Following instructions given in morning class, determine your ideological position by taking an online quiz. Public Policy Topic Development Meetings are to be completed by 5 PM. Contact Mandy Swygart-Hobaugh.

#5--9:30 AM, South 302: Ivan Eland, "The Empire Strikes Out: The "New Imperialism and its Fatal Flaws, pp. 1-21; Ricks Thomas (2003, December 23). Holding their Ground: As Critics Zero In, Paul Wolfowitz is Unflinching on Iraq Policy [Electronic Version]. Washington Post. Lewis, Bernard. (2003, December 22). Democracy and the Enemies of Freedom [Electronic Version]. Wall Street Journal. Bumiller Elisabeth (2004, January 7) "A Partner in Shaping an Assertive Foreign Policy [Electronic Version]. New York Times. Frum D. & R. Perle (2004, January 7) "Beware the Soft-Line Ideologues [Electronic Version]." Wall St. Journal.

WEEK #2

#6--9:30 AM, South 302: Principles, Chapter 9. Professor David Loebsack in class at 10:30 to talk about the Democratic Pary Caucus;5 PM, Abstract/Topic Essay/Outline Due

#7--1:30, South 302: Principles, Ch. 4; Who are Senator Zell Miller and Rep. Ralph Hall? ; Background to the Iowa Caucus

#8-1:30, South 302: Principles, Ch. 5; Candidates, Dean v. Gephardt; "The Bush Presidency at Midterm";York, Byron. (2003, December 31) George W. Bush and the Democratic Mind [Electronic Version]. National Review.

#9--1:30, South 302: Principles, Ch. 6; Iowa, New Hampshire and Beyond, two articles from the Economist, Dec. 30, 2003. 2 pm J. Rouse, Writing Center, From Topic to Thesis

#10: 9:30 Midterm Examination; Research Check-up with Mandy Swygart-Hobaugh

WEEK #3

DAY ASSIGNMENT

#11--Initial Draft of Policy Paper Due 5 PM, 302 South Hall. Caucus Night, 6:30 PM

#12--1:30, Class Meets in Law 121. Caucus night analysis--two national, one local + 3 articles assigned on Friday

#13--1:30: Class Meets in Law 121. Principles, pp. 227-236; three articles from the Economist: August 12, 1999 The People's Voice [Electronic Version], January 23, 2003 Caught in the Net [Electronic Version] & Power to the People [Electronic Version]; Barnes, Fred. January 20, 2003. Iowa Winners and Losers [Electronic Version]. Weekly Standard

#14--1:30: Class Meets in South 302. Principles, pp. 236-258;Cummings, Jeanne. (January 21, 2004) New Rules of Bankrolling a Candidate [Electronic Version]. Wall Street Journal

#15--9:30: South 302. Articles on the Electoral College

WEEK #4

DAY ASSIGNMENT

#16--Appointments at the Writing Studio

#17--9:30 AM Final Examination

#18-5 pm, South 302: Public Policy Paper & Bibliography Due

PUBLIC POLICY PRESENTATION

Objective: Advanced courses in the study of politics depend heavily on successful completion of written and oral public policy presentations. See for example the Public Policy Paper Assignment for American Politics. Writing will be emphasized in this course. Public policy papers of high quality require well developed skills in public policy research and in logical organization and argument. The immediate goal of the course is to advance the skills of each student in both respects. The long term goal is to enable those in the course to command respect whenever they take a stand and advocate their positions. Law, business, journalism, and government are only a few of the professional settings where effective advocacy is the heart of merit. More personal settings, like a parent advocating budget priorities before a school board, are equally dependent on the practice, confidence, and skills advanced by successful completion of the presentation assigned.

Assignment: 50% of the grade of the course rests on performance in researching a public policy topic, organizing the material in a persuasive outline supported by a bibliography, and writing a public policy paper. The presentation must advocate a change in public policy within the Constitutional power of American national government, including any of its agencies or subdivisions. The change must be unique in the sense that no other student in the course can argue for the same change in the same policy. Exceptions may be granted by the instructor in response to skillful advocacy.

Assignment Stages: The three stages outlined below roughly correspond to weeks of the course and good presentations rarely deviate from a stage per week schedule. Students who find themselves struggling in the second week to define the public policy they seek to change will run out of time in producing their best work on the initial outline due at the end of the second week. NOTE: STAY ON SCHEDULE!!

  1. TOPIC DEVELOPMENT: All students must send by 5 PM Monday, January 12th, an e-mail message to the instructor and to Mandy Swygart-Hobaugh specifying the public policy to be addressed by the paper. The message should include: 1) an abstract (250 words) 2) a short essay (250 words) on the public policy area in which you expect to find a thesis and why you happened to choose it over others, and an outline of how you plan to develop the thesis.
  2. THESIS DEVELOPMENT: The thesis of a public policy presentation is a policy recommendation addressed to the person in National government who, more than any other, is responsible for making the change advocated by the presentation. So, "a nation-wide speed limit on interstate highways" is a topic. But a thesis would be: "Rep. Don Young, Chair of the House Transportation and Infrastructure Committee, should introduce legislation and should lead his Committee to endorse House approval for a maximum national speed limit of 55 miles per hour on all interstate highways." Good research is the foundation of effective advocacy and no person is in a better position to evaluate performance in research than Mandy Swygart-Hobaugh. Every student must meet individually with her at least once by 5 PM Thursday, January 8th.
  3. PAPER DEVELOPMENT I, Completed Initial Draft, due Monday, January 19th: Persuasive writing is the heart of a good public policy paper and no source is better qualified for assisting students in such writing than the staff at the Writing Center. Ask for help from those who have written public policy papers or have experience guiding students in such papers. Jai Pattur, Sephanie Haskins, and Abigal Ozanne have excellent backgrounds for helping with public policy papers.The early stages of an initial draft may be rather more descriptive of research information found than persuasive or prescriptive. The completed, initial draft, however, must offer a thesis, which often involves a systematic rethinking and reorganization of the more descriptive, initial draft. The thesis, or policy recommendation, should appear at or near the beginning of the paper. The reasons why the policy recommended is the best policy, compared to other ones, begins by extracting evidence from the research completed. The results are spelled out in a chain of logical connections emphasized by tightly linked transitions. Some attention needs to be given to responding to objections raised by those who support other policy responses to the same problem. Detailed reseach information appears mostly in footnotes and at crucial points in the text as supporting evidence for reasons given in behalf of the policy recommendation. The completed draft is due by 5 PM on Monday, January 19th.
  4. PAPER DEVELOPMENT II, Revised Paper: Performance in prior stages often determines the letter grade of the paper; revision often determines whether a "+" or "-" is added to the letter grade. Suggestions by the instructor on your completed draft should initially guide your revision but the Writing Center provides crucial help in obtaining good results from revision. Be sure to make an appointment with a staff member for January 22-23 and January 26-27. Be sure to provide them with a copy of your revision before the appointed time, and work closely with them until the paper is due at 5 PM on Wednesday, January 28th.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES

The daily "Learning Objectives" point to the most important ideas and concepts to be discussed in class on a particular day. They often depend heavily on reading assignments. The habit of mastering such material will assure good performance in unannounced quizzes.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES -- DAY #1

Before afternoon class meets, you should be able to answer these questions:
    1. How does Professor Huntington define a civilization.
    2. What is his thesis and why is he convinced that civilizations will clash?
    3. What is the kin country syndrome and how does it support Professor Huntington's thesis? Distinguish between micro & macro clashes. What are the "weapon states" & why are they important?
    4. What are the two sources of conflict between the West and other civilizations? What is a torn country and how is the tare resolved?
    5. How is the Confucian-Islamic connection related to the "West versus the rest"?
    6. What values are at the heart of Western Civilization, according to Professor Huntington?
    7. What are Huntington's short and long term recommendations?
    8. What does Margaret Thatcher consider to be the "most important problems today" and how is it related to the current supremecy of America and Britain?
    9. What are the three points in the triangle that provide moral foundations for the West and how are they related to one another?
    10. What "new world order" does Mrs. Thatcher condemn and why?
    11. What does Vice President Richard Cheney consider to be Margaret Thatcher's greatest achievement?
    12. Why must the West prevail, according to Margaret Thatcher, and how can its decline be arrested?
    13. How does Prime Minister Blair attempt to clarify the clash initially discussed by Professor Huntington?
    14. What is the threat and why does it force a redefinition of security and diplomacy?
    15. What additional policies are required to reduce the threat further?
    16. What is the future role of the U.K?
LEARNING OBJECTIVES -- DAY #2
Before class meets, you should be able to explain the essential differences between authoritarian and repubican kinds of government and to answer the following questions:
    1. Define: state, nation-state, and nationalism
    2. Distinguish competing theories as to the origins of the state. How is Coulter's discussion related to the civilizational clash between Islamic militants and the West?
    3. Distinguish the social contract theories of Hobbes, Locke, and Rousseau. Why are all at odds with Islamic militants?
    4. Describe the political organization of the feudal state and its symbiotic relationship with the Christian church. Describe the role of the Protestant Reformation in the creation of the modern state.
    5. Define ultranationalism and explain several major problems associated with it. How is it related to Islamic revolutionary movements?
    6. Describe the causes and consequences of nationalism in the modern world.
    7. What is a "market state" generically understood; what are three variations; what examples of each can you site?
    8. Why are nation states losing control over their sovereignty?
    9. Why would an international system of market states be more apt to form coalitions?
    10. Why will markets never replace states, no matter how strong international agreements become in advancing a global free trade economy?
    11. What connects globalization to terrorism, according to Niall Ferguson?
    12. What asymmetry lead to the illusion that America could remain safely detached from political conflicts from area conficts that plagued other parts of the globe?
    13. What dispute exists between Professor Ferguson and the unholy alliance he critizes?
    14. Why is America, especially New York, hated by Islamic fundamentalists?
    15. What other empire is America most likely to resemble and why?
LEARNING OBJECTIVES -- DAY #3
  1. How is national interest related to foreign policy?
  2. What concerns does Edwin Coulter have with the way national security is defined and to what extent have they been superceded by events. Distinguish with particular care between what Coulter calls the "threat system" vs. its alternative. (see especially pp. 262, 264, & 268-69)
  3. What are the organizing principles of national security structures?
  4. What do diplomats do and what customs are required to support it. Explain in some detail the methods of third party diplomacy & the limited role of international law in settling disputes.
  5. What is a balance of power and explain at least two reasons why it is important in international relations, especially given the end of the Cold War and Huntington's thesis.
  6. What precedent exists for the U.N.? What purposes does it serve and how is it organized. Why has it declined as an effective peacekeeper?
  7. Why is general war among nations an unlikely event today, according to Coulter? What kind of war has replaced it and how is such low-intensity conflict related to terrorism?

LEARNING OBJECTIVES -- DAY #4

  1. Define: ideology. Describe the origin of the concepts of "ideological right" and "ideological left."
  2. Identify and explain the pairs of characteristics which Coulter calls "tendencies of the left" and "tendencies of the right."
  3. How is political democracy related to these ideologies, why does Coulter consider it to be so fragile, even as it seems to triumph and spread?
  4. Which of the prerequisites for political democracy are more cultural than constitutional?
  5. Explain the four key individuals for the evolution of classic liberalism and the ideas most associated with each.. What is neo-liberalism? What impact have Clinton-Gore Democrats had on neo-liberalism?
  6. What fundamental difference distinguishes classic from modern conservatism? What are the main features of the "New Right" How is it extended by "libertarians" & "neoconservatives?"
  7. What supplement to Coulter's discussion is necessary to update it for Election 2004?
  8. What is classic socialism and from what early sources did it draw? How has it been extended by the two distinct versions of social democratic parties? What is the likely future of state socialism, according to Coulter?

LEARNING OBJECTIVES -- DAY #5

  1. What is "enlightened imperialism," out of what background does it come, and what debate surrounds the US role in such imperialism?
  2. What is the theory of "hegemonic stability" and what is the underlying logic for the strategy of empire?
  3. What do "realists" claim will eventually befall imperial powers, no matter how strong? Give three reasons for such an outcome and be able to explain each in detail. Key terms: free riders, balance-prone powers, strategic overextension, challenges invited by extended deterence, deteriorating competitive advantage of states burdened by providing security, the cost/benefit test.
  4. Why is insecurity likely to increase the more the US commits itself to the strategy of empire?
  5. Who is Paul Wolfowitz and why is he important?
  6. What are his views on American policy toward Iraq and out of what background have they developed?
  7. What criticism are leveled against Mr. Wolfowitz and how does he respond to them?
  8. Who is Bernard Lewis and what does how does he distinguish between 2 kinds of terrorism?
  9. How is the first kind related to European totalitarianism; how is the second dramatically different (for a more complete answer review Professor Ferguson's comments on why New York is so much an object of hatred)?
  10. What traditions of writing and thought support development of democratic institutions in the Middle East?
  11. Give an example of Dr. Rice partnership with President Bush; what do each bring to their common task; when & why will it end?
  12. What criticism has been leveled at her and why? How as the partnership survived the challenges it has faced?
  13. How has the political split over Iraq been reflected within the President's advisors. Why are the labels often used to identify the two sides misleading, according to Frum and Perle. Give two examples.

LEARNING OBJECTIVES--DAY#6

  1. How does Coulter define political parties in such a way as to lead to the conclusion that the U.S. "lacks political parties." (See p. 213: "The American party system is really a 'no-party' system. . . .")
  2. Which parties prevailed in what periods and why? Be especially specific about the period after 1932.
  3. What does Coulter mean by a "policy realignment without a party realignment?"
  4. What is the role of American political parties and how does it reflect the qualities most often associated with American voters?
  5. Identify three characteristics of interest groups and what important role do they play in the political process.
  6. How do interest groups operate differently in the U.S. compared to European systems?

LEARNING OBJECTIVES -- DAY #7

  1. What distinction does Aristotle make between a polity and a democracy; how are both distinguished from political democracies of today?
  2. How are constitutional governments distinguished from others?
  3. Explain the locus of sovereignty in unitary, confederal, and federal forms of government.
  4. Explain the basic federal division of authority in the American constitution; how much importance should be attached to it, according to Coulter? What principles are essential to any authentic federal system?
  5. Distinguish the presidential system of government in the United States from the parliamentary system in Great Britain in terms of general characteristics, the role of the political parties, the method of election, and the role of the political minority. Who are Senator Zell Miller and Rep. Ralph Hall and why are they important in understanding American political parties?
  6. Describe the locus of executive, legislative, and judicial authority under the presidential and parliamentary systems referred to above.
  7. Explain the features of a coalition government and the problems associated with it.
  8. Explain the advantages of the parliamentary system over the presidential system according to Coulter.
  9. How recently have the Iowa caucuses become important in presidential politics and why do they continue to be so?
  10. How do the two party caucuses work? What is crossover mischief? Why do some candidates skip the Iowa caucuses?
  11. To what extent do the parties differ in cohesion, both nationally and in Iowa? What is "retail" or "grass roots" politics?
LEARNING OBJECTIVES--DAY #8
  1. Briefly explain (3 sentences or less) six legislative functions
  2. What does Coulter consider to be the fundamental power of executive leadership?
  3. What confirmation does James Pfiffner offer to support Coulter's answer to the question "How does an executive manage to move a government?"
  4. In which of the policy-making powers has President Bush had the least impact and why?
  5. Name four administrative responsibilities of judges. What conclusion does Coulter draw from the these duties performed by judges.
  6. Who are the regulators and what functions do they aim to perform? How does their structure and powers reflect their aim? Why is the independence of regulatory agencies less important than is often assumed? To what extent do fares for airline tickets reflect the benefits and costs of deregulation?
  7. What distinguishes the George W. Bush presidency from the Clinton presidency, according to Michael Barone?
  8. Who is Fred Greenstein and what features of presidential leadership in his work enable Fred Barnes to arrive at his conditional conclusion that the 2004 election will be like the 1984 election?
  9. To what extent does Carl Cannon disagree with Fred Barnes about President Bush's strengths in presidential leadership
  10. How do advocates of the Bush Administration respond to allegations about Halliburton, the Patriot Act, and the Deficit?

    LEARNING OBJECTIVES--DAY#9

    1. Distinguish normative from positive law. Which tends to prevail in the West today and why?
    2. Distinguish criminal (public) from civil (private) law. Why does the strength and superiority of the West rest upon its achievements in civil law?
    3. How does Coulter define the rule of law and to what extent does his treatment of the subject promote doubts about his thoughts on legal concepts?
    4. Explain four stages often associated with the evolution of legal systems and distinguish Roman from the Anglo-Saxon Common law.
    5. Explain the problems Coulter considers important in the qualifications, selection, and tenure of U. S. judges, why the problems persist, and what measures the Supreme Court has adopted to address them? Are Coulter's exalted views and expectations of the judiciary exaggerated?
    6. Define equity law and five writs associated with it.
    7. Distinguish original from appellate jurisdiction. What is summary jurisdiction? What primary purpose is served by state supreme courts? Define "judicial review" and explain its importance for constitutional government.
    8. What is a "frontloaded timetable" and what were Democratic Party leaders thinking when they created it?
    9. What is the "invisible primary" and who has already won it? How has his victory increased a split within the Democratic Party?
    10. What are President Bush's prospects for winning re-election and why? How could he fail?
    11. Why is the 2004 election a crucial one? To what extent does President Bush bear responsibility for the highly devisive and aggressive style of his opposition?
    12. What has traditionally been the role of the center in American politics as election day approaches and to what extent is it likely to play the same role in 2004?

LEARNING OBJECTIVES--TUESDAY, JAN. 20TH

  1. What is "soft money" and how is it now being raised? What new regulations are needed to carry out the promise of the new campaign finance law?
  2. What agency is responsible for making them? Who makes the decision on these regulations and what party loyalties do they bring to it? What is the decision-making process?
  3. On what is the money raised being spent and which party depends on it most heavily? How do defenders of soft money justify their fund-raising efforts?
  4. What groups have been most aggressive in trying to stop soft money fund-raisers and what support do they take from the courts?
  5. What are the "two starkly different views" of a winning strategy that will put a Democrat in the White House next year? How is the difference expressed by the leading Democrats who are experienced campaign managers?
  6. What is a "fortress state" (incl. examples for each party) and what is the ratio of electoral votes for each side? How does the ratio point to a 2004 election outcome that is far short of a rout?
  7. What issues motivate the "small number of voters in a small number of states" that matter most in the 2004 elections and how do the parties divide on them?
  8. What connections link Clark to the Clintons? Are the connections becoming stronger or weaker? What original view has Gen. Clark taken of these connections and why is he likely to return to it after the election?

    LEARNING OBJECTIVES--WEDNESDAY, JAN. 21th

  1. What is the difference between voting understood rather as a duty than a right?
  2. What two developments in voting transformed elections in 19th & 20th century democracies?
  3. What is meant by "initiative," "referendum," and "recall"? Be able to discuss recent, important examples?
  4. Why does Coulter greet with relief that absence of these measures at the national level? To what extent do the Economist articles confirm Coulter's conern?
  5. Why do legislators sometimes resort to them? With what possible impact on representative democracy?
  6. What tentative conclusions are evident from the experiences of California and Switzerland?
  7. Why are new communications techologies less a force on the side of political democracy than several American presidents have supposed?
  8. To what extent is has China's experience confirmed the success of authoritarian regimes?
  9. Who are "hacktivists," why are they important but unlikely to be successful?
  10. What hopes inspired "cyber-dreamers" and how do they relate to one of the most fundamental debates about the nature of democracy?
  11. What is "protest politics," who participates in it, why, and how? Are these methods popularly supported by voters?
  12. What constitutional change seems very likely in the next decade and why do critics of it command attention and respect?
  13. What are "intermediate institutions" and what new ones are being proposed to replace old ones?
  14. Why are "big-money interests" concerned?

LEARNING OBJECTIVES--THURSDAY, JAN. 22nd

  1. What advantages compel nations to look to other bases for representation than simple, popular representation? Why has geographical representation become especially problematic in the U.S., according to Coulter?
  2. What are the advantages of unicamalism and why is the U.S. unlikely to benefit from them?
  3. Define the following terms: at-large representation, single-member district, proportinal representation, open v. closed ballot.
  4. What advantages and disadvantages are associated with the two basic types of representation mentioned above?
  5. How does the Electoral College work to encourage third party initiatives?
  6. How does simple gerrymandering differ from compound gerrymandering? Why is gerrymandering, in one form or another, inevitable?
  7. What concerns does Coulter express about the achieving effective representation in Congress?
  8. Why are committees important in every legislature, especially in American government?
  9. What is the contribution limit per person for individual candidates, for PACs, for parties? What overall cap applies?

LEARNING OBJECTIVES--FRIDAY, JAN. 23nd

  1. What is an electoral "legitimacy crisis" and what features of the 1992 election made it seem probable?
  2. What considerations led to an Electoral College in the U. S. Constitution?
  3. What amendments have been proposed? What changes in House Rules offer a partial alternative to amendment?
  4. In the light of the 2000 election, what doubts led the Economist to dismiss direct presidential elections? What reform of the Electoral College seems more acceptable?
  5. What partisan considerations have blocked progress toward direct election in Congress, according to Michael Nelson?
  6. How many minority presidents have there actually been and what reasons keep Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. from supporting direct election? What does he propose instead? Why?
Maintained by: politics@cornellcollege.edu
600 First Street West, Mt. Vernon, Iowa, 52314 ©2003 Cornell College; All Rights Reserved