Cornell College Department
About Cornell Academics Admissions Alumni Athletics Offices Library

Department of Politics

Body POLITICS 111

FIRST MIDTERM EXAM FULL CREDIT ANSWERS

What features in Coulter's definition of a nation-state require amendment and clarification by the emergence of market states? Two features essential to a nation-state are sovereignty and territorial boundaries. Market states lessen the importance of both. A market state, as the term has been developed by Bobbitt, is shaped by the global interdepence resulting from world-wide exchange of such goods as communication, commerce, information, and technology in a process known as globalization. National borders seem to melt before the massive and speedy movement of 21st century goods (see for example the absence of border controls within the European Union) and the importance of sovereignty fades as nation-states give up to international agreements their right to restrict the exchange of these goods.

What prerequisite of political democracy is most opposed to the equation of money and political power? The equation of money and power, as explained by Dr. Sutherland, results in a concentration of power in order to have the impact that money concentrated in large amounts has. Big money is never ignored, nor is might. To distribute power among many, and thus insist that power differs fundamentally from money, requires much faith in the ability of people to manage their own affairs. Such faith seems warranted where individual initiative is unleashed and the result is to increase the total amount of power for pursuit of national ends. (Note: There is no definitive answer, since "the right to participate is as broad as possible" [p. 143] is a prerequisite that could be the basis of an equally outstanding answer).

Contrast the term "social democrat" and "liberal democrat" as the latter is applied to a candidate like Gov. Dean? Social democrat is a term that grows out of 19th century socialist ideology while liberal democrat refers to the left wing of the American Democratic Party, which originated in 18th century liberalism. Liberalism and socialism differ fundamentally on supplying such social goods as health, education, housing, etc. Liberalism places primary responsibility on the individual. Socialism makes the state responsible for supplying these goods and the state taxes individuals to pay for what it supplies. In the U.S. during the 1930's, the Great Depression drove people who regarded themselves as liberals into increasing the role of the national government in providing social services. Such people were called neo-liberals, but today they are more commonly known in the media as liberal democrats. The Democratic Party leaders of the 1960's and 1970's, including George McGovern, Teddy Kennedy, Barney Frank, etc. continue to be recognized as active liberal democrats, but among Democratic contenders for the Party nomination, Gov. Dean is most often cited as a liberal democrat.

What are two of the three reasons Eland gives for explaining why an American empire will result in a loss of U. S. global prominence? An American empire is vulnerable on three counts: 1) the free rider effect, 2) the emergence of balance-prone powers to rival the superpower, 3) the danger of overextension. First, weaker powers are spared the expense of providing for their own security, since the imperial power insists on maintaining an overwhelmingly dominant position in military might. The result is that weaker powers usually grow faster than the dominant power, which must continually chase terrorists and keep choas in check, activities that consume much wealth but generate none. Second, a dominant power, like the U.S., provokes rivals to try to become an equal in power and might. At first, the dominant power may be so superior that rivals fail, but as the burden of providing security becomes heavier and heavier, rivals stand a better chance and eventually they bring down the dominant power. Third, providing peace and security is an open-ended task. There are no obvious lines that can be drawn to limit the responsibility of a dominant power. As a result, the dominant power inevitably becomes overextended. Exhaustion results and the dominant power ceases eventually to be able to respond fast enough and with enough might to far-flung outbreaks of violence. Rivals are always on the alert for any weakness and are quick to take advantage. Eland insists that the U.S. can remain strong only so long as it refuses to shoulder many of the world-wide, security responsibilities that seem now to be directed to it.

Which two of the five methods of 3rd party diplomacy does P. M. Blair have in mind? The least likely methods are the ones that depend most on an international court or other legal structures, since the U.S. has no confidence in these methods. Among the three remaining, "good offices," "mediation," and "conciliation" a good case could be made for any one, depending on how sharp the dispute and how much the U. S. trusts Britain. In mild disputes in which Britain is highly trusted, conciliation may be effective. Britain could then lead a diplomatic team that investigates the dispute and recommends a solution that the U.S. is likely to accept. More commonly, however, good offices are the method of first choice. As a neutral party outside the dispute, Britain provides a calm setting in which the two opposing sides can get a fair hearing and begin to engage each other in the search for common ground on which to resolve differences. Mediation makes Britain more active in seeking a resolution. It would investigate the differences independently of what each party contends and it would develop a proposed solution that is fair to both.

 

Maintained by: rsutherland@cornellcollege.edu
600 First Street West, Mt. Vernon, Iowa, 52314 ©2003 Cornell College; All Rights Reserved